Bill SB 290 that if enacted would enable the California Governor, Insurance Commissioner, and Treasurer to purchase insurance, reinsurance, insurance-linked securities (ILS), or other alternative risk transfer (ART) products to help pay costs resulting from natural disasters, is making progress.
The bill passed a key committee of the Senate Governmental Organization yesterday and has now been moved on to the Senate Committee on Appropriations as the next stage in its journey.
The bill has not had any amendments raised as yet, meaning the text remains in its initial state.
If passed by the state’s legislature it could result in California becoming a purchaser of ILS or catastrophe bonds, in order to hedge some of its exposure to losses from disaster events including earthquake, wildfires and flooding.
Utilising ILS and catastrophe bonds, or traditional insurance and reinsurance, as structures to secure financing that can be used in the event of major disaster is increasingly coming up in political circles.
There are plenty of use-cases that demonstrate the efficacy of the risk transfer and risk financing that ILS products can offer and with the appetite of the capital markets to invest in such instruments still strong, it makes perfect sense for States such as California to be able to tap into these risk financing sources.
“Climate change has led to devastating wildfires, and we need a strategy to reduce the strain that puts on the state’s coffers,” explained Sen. Dodd. “Unpredictable disaster costs require large budget reserves and threaten cuts to critical programs. Allowing the state to invest in an insurance policy will provide predictability and limit taxpayers’ risk of increasing disasters costs.”
“As the risk of extreme wildfires rises we need to make sustained investments for more resilient communities,” added Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara. “California Disaster Insurance is a creative solution to protect our communities and our budget in a disaster, giving us flexibility to invest in prevention and keep insurance affordable despite rising threats linked to climate change.”
“Most of us have house insurance, auto insurance, maybe earthquake and flood insurance,” explained Ma. “Why doesn’t the state have disaster insurance to reduce its financial exposure?”
California paid out $947 million in 2017-18 through its emergency fund for firefighting, which is almost $450 million over budget, according to Cal Fire.
The costs of fighting wildfires have exceeded Cal Fire’s emergency budget in seven of the last 10 years as well.
These costs could be transferred to reinsurance and capital markets through ILS structures, or insurance products, if the risk is accurately quantified and priced commensurate with it.
The bill could also see disaster risk transfer bought for earthquake risks and flooding as well. With earthquakes the potential costs that the state of California would face from a major event would be significant, hence the capital markets could provide a useful financial buffer that could pay out the moment a major earthquake disaster struck the state.
If the bill passes, any California Disaster Insurance that was purchased is expected to be paid for from state available funds, the lawmakers said.
There remains a long way for this bill to travel through the senate and related government department’s, but its progress has so far been encouraging and it will be interesting to see how far it can get.
We’re returning to Singapore for our fourth annual ILS market conference for the Asia region. Please register today to secure the best prices. Early bird tickets are still on sale.