More details on QBE’s VenTerra Re Ltd. catastrophe bond


Some more details have become available on QBE Insurance Group’s first catastrophe bond transaction, VenTerra Re Ltd. (Series 2013-1), which sees the insurer seeking reinsurance coverage from the capital markets for a number of perils including Australian risks.

With the VenTerra Re cat bond QBE Insurance Group Ltd. is making its first visit to the catastrophe bond market and the deal offers investors in insurance-linked securities (ILS) a welcome diversification opportunity through the inclusion of some Australian perils. The deal has now received its preliminary rating and some further details are available from Standard & Poor’s report on the cat bond.

With the issuance of VenTerra Re Ltd. QBE Insurance Group is seeking a three-year source of risk transfer via a fully-collateralized reinsurance agreement which provides protection on a per-occurrence basis for losses from earthquakes in the U.S. and Australia and tropical cyclones in Australia.

The notes being issued by VenTerra Re will provide broad cover for these perils, according to S&P, as the covered perils for earthquakes includes; related earth shake, fire, sprinkler leakage, volcanic disturbance or eruption, tsunami, and flooding due to dam or levy ruptures, and the coverage for tropical cyclones includes; ensuing damage caused by related windstorm, rainstorm, hailstorm, tornado, flood, and storm surge.

The transaction covers a number of QBE Insurance Group subsidiaries, but the transaction is being facilitated through QBE’s captive reinsurer Equator Reinsurances Ltd. Equator Re will act as the agent for the companies covered by the deal for the purposes of sending and receiving notices required under the reinsurance agreements, as well as for remitting or receiving any amounts due to or from VenTerra Re.

That means that Equator Re will make premium payments due to VenTerra Re and will funnel the premiums from each covered subsidiary. Equator Re will be responsible for paying funds from any subsidiary that does not make a payment as well.

S&P notes that the trigger, which is indemnity based, is more narrowly defined than many recent cat bonds it has assessed. In the case of VenTerra Re, this means that the trigger cannot be interpreted to aggregate earthquakes occurring more than a week apart.

In fact the trigger also include a parametric element in it as only earthquake events of a certain intensity or greater can qualify as a covered event for ground shake under the terms of the deal.

S&P explains;

“An earthquake is reported by the USGS and identified in the U.S. earthquake event report available 30 calendar days after its occurrence time if it caused ground shaking in the covered area with instrumental intensity of VI or greater. An earthquake in Australia is reported by the USGS–or if not the USGS, Geoscience Australia–and identified in the Australian earthquake event report available 30 calendar days after the occurrence if it caused ground shaking in the covered area with instrumental intensity of VI or greater.

To clarify, “ground shaking in the covered area” means that, if a quake happens and does not cause shaking inside the covered area but a tsunami were to hit the covered area, this would be a covered event. “Instrumental intensity of VI or greater,” on the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale (MMI), means “felt by all, many frightened. Some heavy furniture moved; a few instances of fallen plaster. Damage slight.” This is the first level on the scale where damage starts to occur.”

If any earthquake directly or indirectly causes losses over a period of greater than seven calendar days, the ceding insurer may divide such earthquake into two or more loss occurrences provided that no two seven calendar-day periods may overlap.

An Australian cyclone is a storm or storm system that is, or at any time was, named by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) or its successor to be a tropical cyclone at any time.

With this trigger construction QBE is seeking to achieve particularly broad coverage for these perils. It’s an interesting way to construct the trigger, something not seen often in cat bonds and it means that the cat bond coverage is broader than you might first expect, however the inclusion of a parametric qualifying factor for an event to be above a certain MMI then narrows the risk again.

The primary risk for the VenTerra Re cat bond is U.S. earthquake, the Australian perils make up just 27% of the modelled risk. The exposures in Australia are fairly widespread which means that any missing data should not have a major bearing on the deal, according to S&P. Most of the exposure in the VenTerra Re cat bond is to personal lines and multifamily dwellings.

The covered area is all 50 states and the District of Columbia for U.S. earthquake risk; for Australian earthquakes and cyclones, the covered area is the entire Commonwealth of Australia.

For U.S earthquakes, the VenTerra Re cat bond notes will cover up to 100% of losses on a per occurrence basis between an initial attachment point of $1.5 billion and an initial exhaustion point of $1.75 billion. For Australian earthquakes and cyclones, the cat bond notes will cover up to 100% of losses on a per occurrence basis between an initial attachment point of A$4.25 billion and an initial exhaustion point of A$4.50 billion.  The attachment probability for the notes is 1.52%, the expected loss is 1.35% and the exhaustion probability is 1.21%.

Based on historical loss analysis undertaken by RMS only the 1906 San Francisco earthquake would have triggered the cat bond. The estimated loss is 59% of the layer from that event. Based on the definition of U.S. earthquakes used in the deal, the 1811-1812 New Madrid quakes would not have been a triggering event. The two most significant events in Australia were the 1954 Adelaide earthquake and 1918 Mackay cyclone. The modeled losses from these events were A$861 million and A$662 million, respectively.

S&P raise a number of other interesting points about the VenTerra Re Ltd. catastrophe bond:

  • The deal covers volcanic eruptions triggered by earthquakes, but the risk modeller RMS does not model losses for volcanic eruption. Also increased seismic activity can help scientists predict volcanic eruptions and where they occur they have the potential to create large insured losses. S&P notes that; “A large volcanic eruption is likely to result in complicated coverage questions in ascertaining whether the earth movement caused the eruption and could lead to coverage by the noteholders.”
  • Tsunami caused by earthquake is also covered, again these are not a modelled peril and they could be caused by an earthquake which does not create enough ground shake to trigger the cat bond, but the tsunami itself could cause it to trigger.
  • Interestingly, S&P says that large portions of the covered business information is not as detailed as in other cat bond transactions. Large portions of the data are coded as “unknown” or “other”, which S&P says is in line with industry practice in Australia.
  • Modelling for Australian perils is generally not as complete as for U.S., so for this cat bond the Australian earthquake and tropical cyclone models do not include factors such as demand surge, fire following or sprinkler leakage, which are modelled for the U.S. earthquake risk. However, S&P noted that these should generally be smaller losses in Australia than in the U.S., as Australia is not as prone to large catastrophes and is less densely populated than the U.S.

Standard & Poor’s said that it assigned its ‘BB(sf)’ preliminary rating to the series 2013-1 class A notes issued by VenTerra Re Ltd.

We’ll bring you more details on the VenTerra Re Ltd. (Series 2013-1) catastrophe bond as it comes to market. Full details for this transaction will be kept updated in our Deal Directory.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Artemis Newsletters and Email Alerts

Receive a regular weekly email newsletter update containing all the top news stories, deals and event information

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Receive alert notifications by email for every article from Artemis as it gets published.

Read previous post:
ILS faces battle for diversifying perils, as traditional reinsurers hold on

The insurance-linked securities (ILS) market, of catastrophe bonds and fully-collateralized alternative reinsurance capital structures, faces a battle for access to...