Catastrophe bond returns higher in 2015 relative to risk: RMS

by Artemis on November 9, 2015

Industry commentary surrounding catastrophe bond rates has suggested lately that market prices have reached a floor, but research from RMS reveals that returns in the asset class relative to risk values are actually higher this year than those seen in 2014.

One of the world’s leading catastrophe risk modelling firms, RMS, has said that investors in the cat bond market have experienced higher returns throughout 2015 than last year.

Recalculating expected losses within the market portfolio to take into account time-value money and seasonal variations, reveals that spreads have actually been higher this year, explains RMS.

“Primary pricing of individual cat bonds is based largely on the expected losses available from ILS portfolio management platforms, but true risk pricing can be calculated only by considering all dimensions of loss, including seasonal variations and the time-value of money.

“Only by having all bonds evaluated in one risk platform can changes in risk premium over time be better evaluated to identify new trends in the market,” said Jin Shah, director, capital markets, at RMS.

The news from RMS could point to greater cat bond price sustainability at the current low levels for a longer period, at least for certain layers of risk, at a time when prevailing market noise suggests that pricing in the sector may have bottomed out.

Shah continued; “The pricing of cat bonds at the end of the third quarter of 2015 was 30 basis points higher than it was on the same date in in 2014, relative to the risk and adjusted for the time-value of money, but only accurate risk and return modelling reveals the true rewards.”

RMS explains that to gain an insight into the true pricing environment of the cat bond market, it applied the same model to over 130 issuances in the secondary trading markets.

The methodology revealed, for example, “that on Sept. 30, 2014, the difference between bond spreads and the adjusted expected loss was 2.22 percent, compared with 2.52 percent on the same day this year,” says RMS.

Catastrophe bond expected loss vs cat cost

Catastrophe bond expected loss vs cat cost - Source: RMS

RMS continues to explain that as the hurricane season approaches cat bond spreads rise each year, and then fall as the season wanes. As a result RMS notes that it split certain analysis between issuances covering U.S. hurricane risks and those that cover U.S. earthquakes, to better account for seasonal pricing impacts.

U.S. wind vs U.S. earthquake cat bonds

U.S. wind vs U.S. earthquake cat bonds - Source: RMS

RMS explains; “This analysis further shows, for both hurricane and earthquake bonds, that spreads were higher this year than last, relative to adjusted risk. Steep drops in excess returns masked roughly static end-of-year returns in the cat bond market, rather than reflecting a risk-based price decline.”

Catastrophe bond issuance levels during 2015 has remained strong, following on from the record-levels witnessed during 2014, which was helped by the $1.5 billion Everglades Re Ltd. (Series 2014-1) deal.

And while some industry commentary has discussed the continued decline in rates and the possibility of pricing reaching a floor, the news from RMS reveals that investors and market participants are achieving better returns than in 2014, which will be welcomed news to those considering to enter the market and utilise the benefits of the insurance-linked securities (ILS) market.

“Despite the prevailing commentary, the catastrophe bond market is returning markedly more to investors today than it did a year ago, when it bottomed out. But only accurate risk and return modelling reveals the true rewards,” said RMS.

Subscribe for free and receive weekly Artemis email updates

Sign up for our regular free email newsletter and ensure you never miss any of the news from Artemis.

← Older Article

Newer Article →